Filip Krajinovic vs Gianluca Mager Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L W L W L L
Form
W L L L L L L L L LHead-2-Head: Krajinovic 2 - 0 Mager
They have played 4 sets in total, with Krajinovic winning 4 and Mager winning 0. The last match between Krajinovic and Mager was at the Sophia Antipolis Challenger, 05-04-2019, Quarterfinals, Clay with Filip Krajinovic getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Filip Krajinovic | 2 |
| Gianluca Mager | 0 |
Sophia Antipolis Challenger(05-04-2019)
7
6
6
4
| Krajinovic | Stats | Mager |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 18% (2-9) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 787 | Ranking | 455 |
| 26 | Highest Rank | 62 |
| 33 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 11 |
| 60% (467-310) | Career Total W/L | 55% (400-325) |
| $3,456,384 | Career Prize Money | $668,315 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Stearns VS Birrell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Krajinovic VS Mager H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats 
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Gianluca Mager
72%
(
58 of
81)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
82)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
| 6-0 6-4 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Gianluca Mager
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
50%
(
29 of
58)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
Krajinovic VS Mager H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 14 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:20:10 | Average Match Time | 1:20:10 |
| 68% (81/119) | 1st Serve % | 51% (72/140) |
| 65% (53/81) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (40/72) |
| 68% (26/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (29/68) |
| 32% (8/25) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 51% (71/140) | Return Points Win % | 34% (40/119) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Filip Krajinovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Filip Krajinovic
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Filip Krajinovic
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Andrea Picchione
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Filip Krajinovic
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Filip Krajinovic
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Martin Damm
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
9
Aces
19
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
25 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
96
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Coria
Player
Filip Krajinovic
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
86
|
0-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Michael Geerts
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Thiem
Player
Filip Krajinovic
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Gianluca Mager Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elias Ymer
Player
Gianluca Mager
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
13
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
29%
(
26 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
109)
110
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
William Mirarchi
Player
Gianluca Mager
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
42
Total Points Won
42
|
2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacopo Vasami
Player
Gianluca Mager
59%
(
51 of
86)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
11
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Gianluca Mager
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Gianluca Mager
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
8
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexey Vatutin
Player
Gianluca Mager
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Araujo
Player
Gianluca Mager
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Gianluca Mager
86%
(
59 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
10
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
23%
(
16 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Rei Sakamoto
Player
Gianluca Mager
53%
(
8 of
15)
1st Serve %
47%
(
7 of
15)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
19
Total Points Won
11
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Titouan Droguet
63%
(
62 of
98)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
7
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
27%
(
21 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (467/310) | Win/Loss | 55% (400/325) |
| 57% (1057/788) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (921/777) |
| 52% (9186/8319) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8389/7837) |
| 52% (100/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 45% (36/44) |
| 66% (269/139) | Clay Win/Loss | 59% (327/229) |
| 57% (86/66) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41% (33/48) |
| 46% (12/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 2516 | Aces Total | 3204 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1007 | Total Double Faults | 1678 |
| 1:12:15 | Average Match Time | 1:16:25 |
| 130.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 511.01 |
| 63% (27695/43730) | 1st Serve % | 59% (23666/40348) |
| 69% (19054/27695) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (16924/23666) |
| 52% (8266/16035) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (8331/16682) |
| 43% (1893/4357) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1542/3893) |
| 40% (17441/43986) | Return Points Win % | 38% (15725/41122) |
| 42% (27/37) | Slam W/L | 29% (6/15) |
| 51% (39/37) | Masters W/L | 37% (7/12) |
| 59% (10/7) | Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) |
| 55% (103/83) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (29/32) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 66% (232/121) | Challenger W/L | 53% (214/187) |
| 69% (56/25) | Futures W/L | 64% (143/79) |
| 61% (441/718) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (392/693) |
| 41% (19/46) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 18% (3/17) |
| 52% (129/249) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (139/267) |
| 57% (135/236) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (124/239) |
| 86% (449/384) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (399/331) |
| 14% (449/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (399/67) |
| 25% (328/82) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (326/66) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
